75°F
Sponsored by

Should Government Tax Your Email?

<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: normal;">A California official is bringing new life to the argument that the Internet -- including emails -- is an untapped revenue resource that should be taxed to help local economies.</span><span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px none; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: normal;"><br></span>

Your property is taxed. Your income is taxed. Your investments are taxed. 

But ... your email?

A California official is bringing new life to the argument that the Internet -- including emails -- is an untapped revenue resource that should be taxed to help local economies. 
Berkeley City Councilman Gordon Wozniak brought up taxing emails during a recent council meeting. He suggested the money collected, which would be part of a wider-reaching Internet tax, could be used in Berkeley's case to save the local post office. 

"There should be something like a bit tax," he said during the March 5 meeting. "I mean, a bit tax could be a cent per gigabit and they would make, probably, billions of dollars a year." 

Plus, he said, there should be a "very tiny tax on email." 

This idea goes beyond already-controversial proposals to tax e-commerce -- like buying used books on Amazon. This would be a tax on data. 

Wozniak told FoxNews.com the response to the idea has been varied. 

"Most people don't like the idea of taxing the Internet," he acknowledged. "There are a number of people who say it's a good idea, but some are saying it's impractical and there's no way to do it." 

For the full story:

Page: [[$index + 1]]
comments powered by Disqus

Poll

[[viewModel.Question]]

[[result.OptionText]] [[calculateVotePercent(result)]]%
[[settings.DelayedResultsMessage]]
Poll sponsored by