Should Circuses Be Animal Free?

National News
Elephants _-702725069326563572
(The New York Times) Is it cruel to use wild animals, such as elephants, tigers and bears, as traveling entertainers? Or would the circus just not be the circus without its animal stars?

Should circuses be animal free?

In “Ringling Brothers Circus Dropping Elephants From Act,” Richard Pérez-Peña writes:

In the 133 years since P. T. Barnum bought his first one, no animal has been so closely identified with the circus as the elephant, starring under the big tents, adorning posters and ritually announcing the circus’ arrival with a gawk-worthy parade into town — in the case of New York, through the Midtown Tunnel.

But after decades of pressure by animal rights activists who say that the giant creatures are treated cruelly, Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey announced Thursday that its three circus companies that still tour the country, performing 1,000 shows a year, would phase out elephant acts, retiring all of the animals by 2018.

“It’s pretty remarkable, since they’ve been fighting this fight for so long, and for over a century the icon of the American circus was the elephant,” said Matthew Wittmann, a historian of circuses who has advocated ending the use of elephants. “The view Ringling always propagated was that you can’t have the circus without the elephants, but the global success of Cirque du Soleil shows that you don’t need to have animals of any kind to have a circus.”

The debate over circus elephants has been framed in moral terms, but both sides described Ringling’s move as fundamentally economic.

“The biggest issue is, there’s been a lot of legislation in different cities and different municipalities,” regulating the use and treatment of animals, said Kenneth Feld, president of Feld Entertainment, Ringling’s parent company. Each elephant costs $65,000 a year to maintain, he said.

Ingrid Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, said people have turned against animal acts as they learn more about the animals and how they are treated. “These are complex, intelligent animals, and this is a lousy, lousy, dirty, cruel business, and people see that,” she said. “This was purely a business decision.”

Copyright 2021 Nexstar Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Don't Miss

Trending Stories

Report It

Latest News

More Local News